Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8406 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 НАТОптыш | Telegram Webview: natoptishh/3461 -
Экипаж «Акации» #1_танковой_армии на Богуславском направлении:
Старший наводчик с позывным «Муха» и командир орудия «Москвич» отработали по целям, включая укрытую пехоту. Все задачи выполнены, цели поражены. Экипаж благодарит близких за поддержку и уверен: враг будет разбит, победа за нами.
Экипаж «Акации» #1_танковой_армии на Богуславском направлении:
Старший наводчик с позывным «Муха» и командир орудия «Москвич» отработали по целям, включая укрытую пехоту. Все задачи выполнены, цели поражены. Экипаж благодарит близких за поддержку и уверен: враг будет разбит, победа за нами.
But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from cn