09.11.2024 г., г. Санкт - Петербург. Вручение наградного знака "За вклад в освобождение Отечества" активисту Национально - Освободительного Движения. https://vk.com/wall-220612227_2981
09.11.2024 г., г. Санкт - Петербург. Вручение наградного знака "За вклад в освобождение Отечества" активисту Национально - Освободительного Движения. https://vk.com/wall-220612227_2981
BY Штаб "НЕВА - НОД"
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. 'Wild West' If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from cn
