Мені було сьогодні рочків, коли я дізнався, що серійний вбивця Анатолій Онопрієнко, який вбив 52 людини, після дев'ятої жертви прийшов до церкви на сповідь, зізнався священнику у вбивствах і попросив його здати міліції.
Але цим священником був Паша Мерседес, і Паша Мерседес йому відмовив. Після чого Онопрієнко вбив ще 43 людини.
Мені було сьогодні рочків, коли я дізнався, що серійний вбивця Анатолій Онопрієнко, який вбив 52 людини, після дев'ятої жертви прийшов до церкви на сповідь, зізнався священнику у вбивствах і попросив його здати міліції.
Але цим священником був Паша Мерседес, і Паша Мерседес йому відмовив. Після чого Онопрієнко вбив ще 43 людини.
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. In the past, it was noticed that through bulk SMSes, investors were induced to invest in or purchase the stocks of certain listed companies. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said.
from cn
