«Я думаю о Дадзае как о пончике. Что посередине? Никто не знает».
Перевели интервью с Кафкой Асагири, автором «Прозы бродячих псов», где он рассказывает о любимых писателях, влиянии «Драконьего жемчуга», понятных антагонистах и роли тайминга в аниме.
«Я думаю о Дадзае как о пончике. Что посередине? Никто не знает».
Перевели интервью с Кафкой Асагири, автором «Прозы бродячих псов», где он рассказывает о любимых писателях, влиянии «Драконьего жемчуга», понятных антагонистах и роли тайминга в аниме.
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from cn
