Весь год вы трудились над крутым контентом, и это не осталось незамеченным: мы посчитали показатели по каналам пиар-деревни и сделали большой объективный рейтинг за 2024 год.
Здесь публикуем одну номинацию «Богатая светлица: рейтинг по просмотрам на пост» с самыми охватными каналами агентств, журналистов, личными каналами пиарщиков и всеми каналами про пиар 🤑
Весь год вы трудились над крутым контентом, и это не осталось незамеченным: мы посчитали показатели по каналам пиар-деревни и сделали большой объективный рейтинг за 2024 год.
Здесь публикуем одну номинацию «Богатая светлица: рейтинг по просмотрам на пост» с самыми охватными каналами агентств, журналистов, личными каналами пиарщиков и всеми каналами про пиар 🤑
Perpetrators of these scams will create a public group on Telegram to promote these investment packages that are usually accompanied by fake testimonies and sometimes advertised as being Shariah-compliant. Interested investors will be asked to directly message the representatives to begin investing in the various investment packages offered. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from cn
