Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8263 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Рыбарь | Telegram Webview: rybar/56315 -
🇷🇺🇺🇦 Пуск зенитной управляемой ракеты по российскому борту Ил-76 был со стороны Харькова с расстояния в 130 км.
UPD: Согласно уточнённым данным, поражение пуск осуществлялся из района Липцев, от которых до села Яблоново, где разбился Ил-76, около 100 км. #Белгород #Россия #Украина @rybar
🇷🇺🇺🇦 Пуск зенитной управляемой ракеты по российскому борту Ил-76 был со стороны Харькова с расстояния в 130 км.
UPD: Согласно уточнённым данным, поражение пуск осуществлялся из района Липцев, от которых до села Яблоново, где разбился Ил-76, около 100 км. #Белгород #Россия #Украина @rybar
One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements.
from cn