Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Итоги научно-практической конференции «Бумага документов Новейшего Времени: реставрация, исследования и сохранность»

В Санкт-Петербургском институте истории РАН 2 декабря 2024 г. состоялась научно-практическая конференция «Бумага документов Новейшего Времени: реставрация, исследования и сохранность».

Уже традиционно СПбИИ РАН проводит конференцию на тему реставрации памятников культуры на бумажной основе. В 2017 г., 2019 и 2022 г. мероприятия были организованы совместно с Библиотекой Академии наук и рассматривали опыт реставрации рукописных памятников XIV–XIX вв. В этом году хронологические рамки сместились, и конференция была посвящена методам реставрации бумаги Нового и Новейшего времени (конец XIX – начало XXI вв.).

Подробнее: https://spbiiran.ru/itogi-nauchno-prakticheskoj-konferencziibumaga-dokumentov-novejshego-vremeni-restavracziya-issledovaniya-i-sohrannost/



group-telegram.com/spbii_ran/1269
Create:
Last Update:

Итоги научно-практической конференции «Бумага документов Новейшего Времени: реставрация, исследования и сохранность»

В Санкт-Петербургском институте истории РАН 2 декабря 2024 г. состоялась научно-практическая конференция «Бумага документов Новейшего Времени: реставрация, исследования и сохранность».

Уже традиционно СПбИИ РАН проводит конференцию на тему реставрации памятников культуры на бумажной основе. В 2017 г., 2019 и 2022 г. мероприятия были организованы совместно с Библиотекой Академии наук и рассматривали опыт реставрации рукописных памятников XIV–XIX вв. В этом году хронологические рамки сместились, и конференция была посвящена методам реставрации бумаги Нового и Новейшего времени (конец XIX – начало XXI вв.).

Подробнее: https://spbiiran.ru/itogi-nauchno-prakticheskoj-konferencziibumaga-dokumentov-novejshego-vremeni-restavracziya-issledovaniya-i-sohrannost/

BY Санкт-Петербургский институт истории РАН












Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/spbii_ran/1269

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from cn


Telegram Санкт-Петербургский институт истории РАН
FROM American