Ольшанский не может найти над чем ещё поныть, поэтому ноет над тем, что в развитом европейском государстве существует веберианская бюрократия. Давайте поможем Ольшанскому найти поводы для нытья, которые не вызывают у читателя испанский стыд!
Ольшанский не может найти над чем ещё поныть, поэтому ноет над тем, что в развитом европейском государстве существует веберианская бюрократия. Давайте поможем Ольшанскому найти поводы для нытья, которые не вызывают у читателя испанский стыд!
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. "Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels." One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals.
from cn
