⁉️ Кто и зачем устраивает анкетирование в вузах со слишком интимными вопросами? Допустимо ли это со стороны государства и работодателя?
Так же работодатели все чаще изучают соцсети потенциальных сотрудников. Нормальная ли это практика или личная жизнь человека к работе отношения не имеет?
В каких случаях можно увольнять сотрудника за “аморальный” контент в соцсетях? Или, если закон не нарушен, то вмешиваться в частную жизнь недопустимо?
⁉️ Кто и зачем устраивает анкетирование в вузах со слишком интимными вопросами? Допустимо ли это со стороны государства и работодателя?
Так же работодатели все чаще изучают соцсети потенциальных сотрудников. Нормальная ли это практика или личная жизнь человека к работе отношения не имеет?
В каких случаях можно увольнять сотрудника за “аморальный” контент в соцсетях? Или, если закон не нарушен, то вмешиваться в частную жизнь недопустимо?
He adds: "Telegram has become my primary news source." This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
from cn
