Олег: А почему нельзя просто сказать хохлы и хохлушки?
Товарищ Артём: Потому что это бред. Термин "хохол" - это вражеский термин, который не объясняет суть происходящих процессов. Термин "хохол" наделяет укрАинствующих русских субъектностью и дает понять, что они не русские, а некие хохлы. А они русские! В этом же суть. УкрАинствующие русские.
На территории, которую принято называть украйной, помимо укросектантов живут русские, не вступившие в секту укрАинствующих. Они в вашей картине мира тоже хохлы?
Олег: А почему нельзя просто сказать хохлы и хохлушки?
Товарищ Артём: Потому что это бред. Термин "хохол" - это вражеский термин, который не объясняет суть происходящих процессов. Термин "хохол" наделяет укрАинствующих русских субъектностью и дает понять, что они не русские, а некие хохлы. А они русские! В этом же суть. УкрАинствующие русские.
На территории, которую принято называть украйной, помимо укросектантов живут русские, не вступившие в секту укрАинствующих. Они в вашей картине мира тоже хохлы?
On Telegram’s website, it says that Pavel Durov “supports Telegram financially and ideologically while Nikolai (Duvov)’s input is technological.” Currently, the Telegram team is based in Dubai, having moved around from Berlin, London and Singapore after departing Russia. Meanwhile, the company which owns Telegram is registered in the British Virgin Islands. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted.
from cn