✏️Tankie's R&R: Более ПОЛОВИНЫ жалоб и требований удалить контент, которые получил Google, пришли от РКН. Ещё раз: РКН отправил их больше, чем ВСЕ страны вместе взятые. Всего Google получил 448 768 жалоб с 2011 года — из них РКН накатал безумные 277 957 жалоб
✏️Tankie's R&R: Более ПОЛОВИНЫ жалоб и требований удалить контент, которые получил Google, пришли от РКН. Ещё раз: РКН отправил их больше, чем ВСЕ страны вместе взятые. Всего Google получил 448 768 жалоб с 2011 года — из них РКН накатал безумные 277 957 жалоб
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from cn
