Question: So who are the titans? Why then cannot the One manifest itself through them? Is not Allah a vivid example of the very One that personifies all being and the divine in the impersonal Absolute?
Answer: There seems to be confusion in terms. In the One, everything is one, sorry for the obviousness. The conflict, polemos, is on the next level, when the One begins to unfold, reveal itself inside the world, which is its manifestation. This is the principle of two, by the way, the Neoplatonists believed that exactly two is the first number and the beginning of the series, because everything starts with two. The One always manifests itself according to the principle of manifestation-in-concealment, therefore, yes, and the titanic principle is, as it were, embraced and taken into the One, but inside it it performs its binary function of opposition. Allah? I'm sorry, what? Here it should be clearly taken into account that the Abrahamic God - he does not have a common measure with the creation, he is fundamentally different from it, and the creature is never "converted" into the Creator. In pagan traditions, in Advaita-monism, etc., the world is the complexly revealed and from-itself-in-itself-hidden Divine.
Question: So who are the titans? Why then cannot the One manifest itself through them? Is not Allah a vivid example of the very One that personifies all being and the divine in the impersonal Absolute?
Answer: There seems to be confusion in terms. In the One, everything is one, sorry for the obviousness. The conflict, polemos, is on the next level, when the One begins to unfold, reveal itself inside the world, which is its manifestation. This is the principle of two, by the way, the Neoplatonists believed that exactly two is the first number and the beginning of the series, because everything starts with two. The One always manifests itself according to the principle of manifestation-in-concealment, therefore, yes, and the titanic principle is, as it were, embraced and taken into the One, but inside it it performs its binary function of opposition. Allah? I'm sorry, what? Here it should be clearly taken into account that the Abrahamic God - he does not have a common measure with the creation, he is fundamentally different from it, and the creature is never "converted" into the Creator. In pagan traditions, in Advaita-monism, etc., the world is the complexly revealed and from-itself-in-itself-hidden Divine.
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. As the war in Ukraine rages, the messaging app Telegram has emerged as the go-to place for unfiltered live war updates for both Ukrainian refugees and increasingly isolated Russians alike. "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from cn
