Для меня Абхазия – не просто объект экспертного комментария, но моя любовь и, увы, моя личная боль. К сожалению, при нынешней абхазской системе, будет нескончаемое "политическое дежавю" с усилением криминализации и хаотизации. Нужна твёрдая воля Кремля. Во всех отношениях. И политическом, и религиозно-политическом. Но об этом не сегодня.
Для меня Абхазия – не просто объект экспертного комментария, но моя любовь и, увы, моя личная боль. К сожалению, при нынешней абхазской системе, будет нескончаемое "политическое дежавю" с усилением криминализации и хаотизации. Нужна твёрдая воля Кремля. Во всех отношениях. И политическом, и религиозно-политическом. Но об этом не сегодня.
BY ТюренковЪ у аппарата
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"The result is on this photo: fiery 'greetings' to the invaders," the Security Service of Ukraine wrote alongside a photo showing several military vehicles among plumes of black smoke. Ukrainian forces have since put up a strong resistance to the Russian troops amid the war that has left hundreds of Ukrainian civilians, including children, dead, according to the United Nations. Ukrainian and international officials have accused Russia of targeting civilian populations with shelling and bombardments. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from cn
