Очередной случай, когда мигранты напали толпой на местного жителя, произошел накануне на Сортировке. Гастарбайтеры в количестве 12-13 человек запинали парня во дворе дома по ул. Билимбаевской. Пострадавший написал заявление в ОП №10, в инциденте разбираются полицейские.
Ранее аналогичная ситуация произошла в екатеринбургском ЖК «Ривер парк», где мигранты напали на мужчину после сделанного им замечания – он упрекнул их за брошенный у подъезда окурок.
Очередной случай, когда мигранты напали толпой на местного жителя, произошел накануне на Сортировке. Гастарбайтеры в количестве 12-13 человек запинали парня во дворе дома по ул. Билимбаевской. Пострадавший написал заявление в ОП №10, в инциденте разбираются полицейские.
Ранее аналогичная ситуация произошла в екатеринбургском ЖК «Ривер парк», где мигранты напали на мужчину после сделанного им замечания – он упрекнул их за брошенный у подъезда окурок.
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. The channel appears to be part of the broader information war that has developed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Kremlin has paid Russian TikTok influencers to push propaganda, according to a Vice News investigation, while ProPublica found that fake Russian fact check videos had been viewed over a million times on Telegram.
from cn
