🇬🇪🇪🇺 Кажется, до Грузии дошло, что ЕС она интересует главным образом в роли второго фронта, и членства ей не светит. Потому прервали переговоры о том, что ей и так не светило.
На деле у Евросоюза много рычагов влияния на Грузию, и от части мер по "защите суверенитета" Иванишвили и Кобахидзе придётся отказаться.
Нам от этого светит только одно - второго фронта против России не будет. Уже хорошо. Наше влияние в Грузии стремится к нулю, и таковым останется.
Кстати, а дорога в НАТО для Грузии не закрыта. И вот такое членство ей светить может.
🇬🇪🇪🇺 Кажется, до Грузии дошло, что ЕС она интересует главным образом в роли второго фронта, и членства ей не светит. Потому прервали переговоры о том, что ей и так не светило.
На деле у Евросоюза много рычагов влияния на Грузию, и от части мер по "защите суверенитета" Иванишвили и Кобахидзе придётся отказаться.
Нам от этого светит только одно - второго фронта против России не будет. Уже хорошо. Наше влияние в Грузии стремится к нулю, и таковым останется.
Кстати, а дорога в НАТО для Грузии не закрыта. И вот такое членство ей светить может.
#Грузия #Евросоюз #русофобия #евроинтеграция
BY Вадим Трухачёв
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
from cn
