Абдрукоўка "па Фрэйду"? Газета "Витебские вести" увогуле дазваляе сабе іранічнае стаўленне да "самай масавай" і "аўтарытэтный" прадзяржаўнай грамадскай структуры.
То памылка пойдзе ў інтэрнэт, а то пра дзейнасць партыі напішуць так, што і пачытаць няма пра што: замест інфармацыі пра зробленае - 30 здымкаў з дзядзенькамі і цёценькамі ў дарагіх касцюмах ➡️https://tinyurl.com/5cvsdju6
Абдрукоўка "па Фрэйду"? Газета "Витебские вести" увогуле дазваляе сабе іранічнае стаўленне да "самай масавай" і "аўтарытэтный" прадзяржаўнай грамадскай структуры.
То памылка пойдзе ў інтэрнэт, а то пра дзейнасць партыі напішуць так, што і пачытаць няма пра што: замест інфармацыі пра зробленае - 30 здымкаў з дзядзенькамі і цёценькамі ў дарагіх касцюмах ➡️https://tinyurl.com/5cvsdju6
READ MORE Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from cn
