Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 3790 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 4096 of 7886 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Взгляд.uz — Новости Узбекистана | Telegram Webview: vzglyaduz/16383 -
Депутат Законодательной палаты Бобур Бекмуродов заявил, что закон о пребывании иностранных граждан в Узбекистане, предусматривающий ограничения для лиц, угрожающих суверенитету страны, будет использован при необходимости. Если будет угроза суверенитету, обязательно применим, заключил он.
Депутат Законодательной палаты Бобур Бекмуродов заявил, что закон о пребывании иностранных граждан в Узбекистане, предусматривающий ограничения для лиц, угрожающих суверенитету страны, будет использован при необходимости. Если будет угроза суверенитету, обязательно применим, заключил он.
For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised.
from cn