📉Чтобы инфляция достигла нижней границы прогнозного диапазона Банка России, текущие темпы должны в среднем составить 5.5% SAAR в остаток года - должны быть выше цели
📈Для достижения верхней границы они должны ускориться до ~11% SAAR
Какие здесь могут быть ориентиры?
i) наша мера базовой инфляции - рост цен в нерегулируемых услугах - в июне составила 7.5% SAAR
📉Чтобы инфляция достигла нижней границы прогнозного диапазона Банка России, текущие темпы должны в среднем составить 5.5% SAAR в остаток года - должны быть выше цели
📈Для достижения верхней границы они должны ускориться до ~11% SAAR
Какие здесь могут быть ориентиры?
i) наша мера базовой инфляции - рост цен в нерегулируемых услугах - в июне составила 7.5% SAAR
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from cn
