«Потери и провал тактики БТГ привел к образованию четырех типов пехоты: расходная, линейная, штурмовая и специальная» (с) Британский аналитический центр о действиях ВС РФ в ходе СВО на Украине
✅ Отвечаю на вопросы: ❓ Как понять, что ты попал в расходники (пушечное мясо)? ❓ Что делать в этом случае?
«Потери и провал тактики БТГ привел к образованию четырех типов пехоты: расходная, линейная, штурмовая и специальная» (с) Британский аналитический центр о действиях ВС РФ в ходе СВО на Украине
✅ Отвечаю на вопросы: ❓ Как понять, что ты попал в расходники (пушечное мясо)? ❓ Что делать в этом случае?
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from cn
