⚡️Песков: Кремль не считает возможным вмешиваться в редакционную политику российских СМИ.
Пресс-секретарь президента отметил, что ситуация с работой медиа в РФ принципиально отличается от западной:
💬«Мы не считаем возможным вмешиваться в редакционную политику. Это удел западных СМИ. Они работают под запредельным прессингом и насилием со стороны своих властей и кураторов».
⚡️Песков: Кремль не считает возможным вмешиваться в редакционную политику российских СМИ.
Пресс-секретарь президента отметил, что ситуация с работой медиа в РФ принципиально отличается от западной:
💬«Мы не считаем возможным вмешиваться в редакционную политику. Это удел западных СМИ. Они работают под запредельным прессингом и насилием со стороны своих властей и кураторов».
BY Dagpravda | Новости Дагестана
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from us
