Глава СК Бастрыкин внезапно возмутился, что бизнес и наука ничего своего за 30 лет не создали:
«Нефть дешевеет, бензин дорожает. Что выясняется: самолётов нет, Роскосмос получает из США составляющие наших российских кораблей, медицина японская...»
Глава СК Бастрыкин внезапно возмутился, что бизнес и наука ничего своего за 30 лет не создали:
«Нефть дешевеет, бензин дорожает. Что выясняется: самолётов нет, Роскосмос получает из США составляющие наших российских кораблей, медицина японская...»
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from de
