Продолжение коммента поста в КбБ последовало - тема не раскрыта. Лакуна осталась, антитезы нет. Вернее, есть но из-под терминологических нагромождений проглядывает нечто смешное. Вопрос, что лучше, олигархия, задрапированная демократией, или она же, но ею не прикрытая, полагаем риторическим. Жаль, третья часть с многополярным миром не предполагается - это могло бы помочь. Говорится же: критикуя - предлагай. И подводя к мысли - не останавливайся, а развивай. Смелее надо быть. "Конца истории" нет. И понятно, какая страна (страны) является ее продолжением. Кажется, именно это хотел высказать автор. Но отчего-то не осилил. Возможно, из-за олигархии.
Продолжение коммента поста в КбБ последовало - тема не раскрыта. Лакуна осталась, антитезы нет. Вернее, есть но из-под терминологических нагромождений проглядывает нечто смешное. Вопрос, что лучше, олигархия, задрапированная демократией, или она же, но ею не прикрытая, полагаем риторическим. Жаль, третья часть с многополярным миром не предполагается - это могло бы помочь. Говорится же: критикуя - предлагай. И подводя к мысли - не останавливайся, а развивай. Смелее надо быть. "Конца истории" нет. И понятно, какая страна (страны) является ее продолжением. Кажется, именно это хотел высказать автор. Но отчего-то не осилил. Возможно, из-за олигархии.
BY Спец по специям
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Markets continued to grapple with the economic and corporate earnings implications relating to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. “We have a ton of uncertainty right now,” said Stephanie Link, chief investment strategist and portfolio manager at Hightower Advisors. “We’re dealing with a war, we’re dealing with inflation. We don’t know what it means to earnings.” Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from de
