So if USAID is an American based organization and sends money to foreign entities which in turn sends it back to the US to influence, buy, , fund or pay off certain people and groups wouldn’t that fall under the category of foreign interference??? EO 13848 covers that one Right?
So if USAID is an American based organization and sends money to foreign entities which in turn sends it back to the US to influence, buy, , fund or pay off certain people and groups wouldn’t that fall under the category of foreign interference??? EO 13848 covers that one Right?
"This time we received the coordinates of enemy vehicles marked 'V' in Kyiv region," it added. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. In the past, it was noticed that through bulk SMSes, investors were induced to invest in or purchase the stocks of certain listed companies. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists."
from de
