Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 11404 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 На самом деле в Херсоне | Telegram Webview: NSDVKhersone/29624 -
В Киеве ТЦКшник – любитель парковаться, как он хочет, угрожал инспектору по парковке, что «призовет» его
Инспектор обратился с претензией к хозяину машины, на что тот объяснил ему. Кто сегодня реальная власть на Руине.
🤷♂️ Все закончилось хорошо. Парковщик позвонил своему начальству, и мужчина сбежал. Может, это и не ТЦКшник был, но то, что именно они сегодня власть в этой стране о однозначно!
В Киеве ТЦКшник – любитель парковаться, как он хочет, угрожал инспектору по парковке, что «призовет» его
Инспектор обратился с претензией к хозяину машины, на что тот объяснил ему. Кто сегодня реальная власть на Руине.
🤷♂️ Все закончилось хорошо. Парковщик позвонил своему начальству, и мужчина сбежал. Может, это и не ТЦКшник был, но то, что именно они сегодня власть в этой стране о однозначно!
Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from de
