Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
From the efficacy of zodiacal astrology to so-called “synchronicities,” there is considerable evidence to suggest that we are inside some kind of programmable information processing system – a computational cosmos that materializes from out of the relationship between chaos, logos, and psyche. To call it a “simulacrum” may be somewhat inaccurate insofar as it makes implicit and unjustified ontological claims about an ‘objective Reality’ that does not exist.

We are probably not living “on a planet” at all – in anything like the sense that people have customarily interpreted that since Copernicus and Galileo. The “reality” of our situation is much more like some cross between Videodrome and Dark City. Or, if we do live on a planet, that planet is not Earth. It is Solaris.
There is no earth. Only fire.


— Jason Reza Jorjani, Satanaeon

Images: Patrick Woodroffe, 1970s-80s



group-telegram.com/OfficialPrometheism/3093
Create:
Last Update:

From the efficacy of zodiacal astrology to so-called “synchronicities,” there is considerable evidence to suggest that we are inside some kind of programmable information processing system – a computational cosmos that materializes from out of the relationship between chaos, logos, and psyche. To call it a “simulacrum” may be somewhat inaccurate insofar as it makes implicit and unjustified ontological claims about an ‘objective Reality’ that does not exist.

We are probably not living “on a planet” at all – in anything like the sense that people have customarily interpreted that since Copernicus and Galileo. The “reality” of our situation is much more like some cross between Videodrome and Dark City. Or, if we do live on a planet, that planet is not Earth. It is Solaris.
There is no earth. Only fire.


— Jason Reza Jorjani, Satanaeon

Images: Patrick Woodroffe, 1970s-80s

BY Prometheism







Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/OfficialPrometheism/3093

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from de


Telegram Prometheism
FROM American