А можно уже как-то всем этим прыщавым общественникам со спермотоксикозом выделить по проститутке? Пусть даже за госсчет. Чтобы они наконец нормально потрахались и перестали лезть в чужие койки. Польза обществу будет значительно превышать затраты.
И ещё вопрос, какого хрена полиция не послала общественников в пешее эротическое путешествие, а поперлась разгонять частное (!) закрытое (!) мероприятие для совершеннолетних людей? Даже если совершеннолетние люди там пьют и занимаются сексом?
А можно уже как-то всем этим прыщавым общественникам со спермотоксикозом выделить по проститутке? Пусть даже за госсчет. Чтобы они наконец нормально потрахались и перестали лезть в чужие койки. Польза обществу будет значительно превышать затраты.
И ещё вопрос, какого хрена полиция не послала общественников в пешее эротическое путешествие, а поперлась разгонять частное (!) закрытое (!) мероприятие для совершеннолетних людей? Даже если совершеннолетние люди там пьют и занимаются сексом?
"He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care.
from de
