Почему бы не пересмотреть классическую бизнес модель донатов, а не сделать Donutelier? Где каждый пончик это произведение искусства и самостоятельный десерт?
Отойдем от этого вайба картонной коробки на дюжину для шерифа полиции.
Почему бы не пересмотреть классическую бизнес модель донатов, а не сделать Donutelier? Где каждый пончик это произведение искусства и самостоятельный десерт?
Отойдем от этого вайба картонной коробки на дюжину для шерифа полиции.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from de
