Понятно, что по кадрам анимацию не оценишь (плюс, опять же, я и не утверждаю, что в «U-20» с экрана льётся сакуга), но тем не менее – можно сравнить их с набором, прикреплённым к прошлому посту и примерно прикинуть, сговнилось ли качество до уровня "подписываем петицию на пересъёмки", или всё же нет. 🤔
Понятно, что по кадрам анимацию не оценишь (плюс, опять же, я и не утверждаю, что в «U-20» с экрана льётся сакуга), но тем не менее – можно сравнить их с набором, прикреплённым к прошлому посту и примерно прикинуть, сговнилось ли качество до уровня "подписываем петицию на пересъёмки", или всё же нет. 🤔
"Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information.
from de
