НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ ГАЛЛЯМОВЫМ АББАСОМ РАДИКОВИЧЕМ. 18+
Есть в этом его сегодняшнем заявлении элемент суетливости. Слишком очевидно считываемое желание произвести впечатление. Позёрство. Надо было ударить - ударил, понятно. Но зачем по этому поводу речь толкать? На войне не слова, а дела нужны.
Можете представить себе Жукова или, там, Сталина, задвигающими такую речь по итогам очередного обмена ударами?
НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ ГАЛЛЯМОВЫМ АББАСОМ РАДИКОВИЧЕМ. 18+
Есть в этом его сегодняшнем заявлении элемент суетливости. Слишком очевидно считываемое желание произвести впечатление. Позёрство. Надо было ударить - ударил, понятно. Но зачем по этому поводу речь толкать? На войне не слова, а дела нужны.
Можете представить себе Жукова или, там, Сталина, задвигающими такую речь по итогам очередного обмена ударами?
BY Аббас Галлямов
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website.
from de
