- Исправлен вылет приложения; - кнопка privacy у ботов в профилях и у мини-приложений (аналог команды /privacy); - отключены адаптивные цвета в браузере; - поддержка punycode для .ton-сайтов; - исправления обложек историй.
- Исправлен вылет приложения; - кнопка privacy у ботов в профилях и у мини-приложений (аналог команды /privacy); - отключены адаптивные цвета в браузере; - поддержка punycode для .ton-сайтов; - исправления обложек историй.
"And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Andrey, a Russian entrepreneur living in Brazil who, fearing retaliation, asked that NPR not use his last name, said Telegram has become one of the few places Russians can access independent news about the war.
from de
