▫️выручка $38,4 млрд (+8% г/г) ▫️скорр. EPS $0,37 (+13%)
💬 Уверенно выросли как результаты ключевого бизнеса (онлайн-коммерция), так и облачных сервисов (выручка +13% г/г). Последние как раз связаны с ИИ-направлением Alibaba.
Alibaba is back, и теперь это акция номер 1 в китайском ИИ. Сильный отчет подпитал позитив вокруг компании, наблюдаемый последний месяц. На американском премаркете бумаги прибавляют 6%. #baba #tech #китай #отчетность 🔥HOTLINE
▫️выручка $38,4 млрд (+8% г/г) ▫️скорр. EPS $0,37 (+13%)
💬 Уверенно выросли как результаты ключевого бизнеса (онлайн-коммерция), так и облачных сервисов (выручка +13% г/г). Последние как раз связаны с ИИ-направлением Alibaba.
Alibaba is back, и теперь это акция номер 1 в китайском ИИ. Сильный отчет подпитал позитив вокруг компании, наблюдаемый последний месяц. На американском премаркете бумаги прибавляют 6%. #baba #tech #китай #отчетность 🔥HOTLINE
BY bitkogan⚡️HOTLINE
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough
from de
