🇰🇷 #ЮжнаяКорея Войска приведены в повышенную готовность — Yonhap 📍Командующий военным положением объявил о приостановке работы парламента и всех политических партий.
📍Также сообщается, что он заявил о введении контроля над всеми СМИ.
📍В столицу Южной Кореи город Сеул введены войска и бронетехника.😯
🇰🇷 #ЮжнаяКорея Войска приведены в повышенную готовность — Yonhap 📍Командующий военным положением объявил о приостановке работы парламента и всех политических партий.
📍Также сообщается, что он заявил о введении контроля над всеми СМИ.
📍В столицу Южной Кореи город Сеул введены войска и бронетехника.😯
Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from de
