🤔💣На одном из ваххабитов - самодельный жилет смертника, а в руках он держит детонатор
Пока что не известно, муляж это или нет. Другие радикалы были также вооружены - ножом и молотком. Жилет со взрывчаткой надет на том из захватчиков, который до этого позировал с экстремистской символикой.
🤔💣На одном из ваххабитов - самодельный жилет смертника, а в руках он держит детонатор
Пока что не известно, муляж это или нет. Другие радикалы были также вооружены - ножом и молотком. Жилет со взрывчаткой надет на том из захватчиков, который до этого позировал с экстремистской символикой.
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "This time we received the coordinates of enemy vehicles marked 'V' in Kyiv region," it added. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from de
