Думаете, вас на просмотре ужастиков в кино пугают скримеры? А теперь представьте, что вы сидите в наушниках, включили полную громкость, потому что герои что-то невнятно бубнят и дышат, а вам всё это надо правильно записать, и тут СКРИМЕР!
Думаете, вас на просмотре ужастиков в кино пугают скримеры? А теперь представьте, что вы сидите в наушниках, включили полную громкость, потому что герои что-то невнятно бубнят и дышат, а вам всё это надо правильно записать, и тут СКРИМЕР!
BY Cereal translator
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." READ MORE The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app.
from de
