С июня 1702 по октябрь 1840 года дёржанские карелы принадлежали семье Новосильцевых - фамилии довольно известной среди русской аристократии. В журнале «Летопись историко-родословного общества в Москве» №1 (45) за 1992 год размещено генеалогическое древо этой семьи. Но «дёржанских» Новосильцевых там нет.
Исправим это упущение. Для этого находим на схеме Якова (№ 24). Его сыном как раз и был стольник Алексей Яковлев Новосильцов, который купил дёржанскую вотчину у окольничего Алексея Тимофеева Лихачёва 3 июня 1702 года. И далее по списку - см. здесь
С июня 1702 по октябрь 1840 года дёржанские карелы принадлежали семье Новосильцевых - фамилии довольно известной среди русской аристократии. В журнале «Летопись историко-родословного общества в Москве» №1 (45) за 1992 год размещено генеалогическое древо этой семьи. Но «дёржанских» Новосильцевых там нет.
Исправим это упущение. Для этого находим на схеме Якова (№ 24). Его сыном как раз и был стольник Алексей Яковлев Новосильцов, который купил дёржанскую вотчину у окольничего Алексея Тимофеева Лихачёва 3 июня 1702 года. И далее по списку - см. здесь
Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from de
