⚡️Le premier bilan officiel de la frappe par l'armée atlantiste ukrainienne de la gare routière de la ville de Makeïevka avec les MLRS Himers fait l'état de 11 victimes, dont une jeune femme qui a décédé. Plusieurs immeubles résidentiels ont été endommagés. https://www.group-telegram.com/doneZkoe_Vremya/15721
⚡️Le premier bilan officiel de la frappe par l'armée atlantiste ukrainienne de la gare routière de la ville de Makeïevka avec les MLRS Himers fait l'état de 11 victimes, dont une jeune femme qui a décédé. Plusieurs immeubles résidentiels ont été endommagés. https://www.group-telegram.com/doneZkoe_Vremya/15721
BY Донбасс-Франция - Donbass-France
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from de
