Офтопну не по теме канала. Не знаю как Канаду, но если Трамп захочет захватить Панамский канал, он сделает это. Причём это юридически обоснуют, а шавки ГосДепа в Эуропе и наши либерасты это поддержат. Я бы посмотрел на это. Кстати и датчанам есть смысл поволноваться. Гренландия может через референдум войти в состав США, если не захотят продать. Бггг. #офтоп #ирония
Офтопну не по теме канала. Не знаю как Канаду, но если Трамп захочет захватить Панамский канал, он сделает это. Причём это юридически обоснуют, а шавки ГосДепа в Эуропе и наши либерасты это поддержат. Я бы посмотрел на это. Кстати и датчанам есть смысл поволноваться. Гренландия может через референдум войти в состав США, если не захотят продать. Бггг. #офтоп #ирония
BY Конец Украины
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news.
from de
