Последнее открытое противостояние России и Украины в Керченском проливе чуть ли не обернулось военным конфликтом ровно 15 лет назад. Тогда соседи спорили о принадлежности острова Тузла, по которому сейчас проходит Крымский мост.
На Тузле появилась пограничная застава. Вплоть до возврата Крыма РФ не признавала Тузлу украинской территорией. Эту разборку политически использовал президент Кучма, который в ноябре 2004 года поддержал на выборах Януковича, но они проиграли Ющенко.
Последнее открытое противостояние России и Украины в Керченском проливе чуть ли не обернулось военным конфликтом ровно 15 лет назад. Тогда соседи спорили о принадлежности острова Тузла, по которому сейчас проходит Крымский мост.
На Тузле появилась пограничная застава. Вплоть до возврата Крыма РФ не признавала Тузлу украинской территорией. Эту разборку политически использовал президент Кучма, который в ноябре 2004 года поддержал на выборах Януковича, но они проиграли Ющенко.
Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from de
