оц҃ь бо любить сн҃а и вьсе показаѥть ѥму ꙗже самъ творить(Отець бо любить Сина і все показаєть Єму яже Сам творить)
Ін. 5:20 із Остромирового Євангелія, 1057, Київ.
Слово "оц҃ь" (Отець) написано з єрь (м'яким знаком, ь) в кінці, як і слова "любить", "показаєть" та "творить", на відміну від синодальних текстів, де в цих словах в кінці стоїть ер (твердий знак, ъ).
оц҃ь бо любить сн҃а и вьсе показаѥть ѥму ꙗже самъ творить(Отець бо любить Сина і все показаєть Єму яже Сам творить)
Ін. 5:20 із Остромирового Євангелія, 1057, Київ.
Слово "оц҃ь" (Отець) написано з єрь (м'яким знаком, ь) в кінці, як і слова "любить", "показаєть" та "творить", на відміну від синодальних текстів, де в цих словах в кінці стоїть ер (твердий знак, ъ).
But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. In this regard, Sebi collaborated with the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to reduce the vulnerability of the securities market to manipulation through misuse of mass communication medium like bulk SMS. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from de
