Напомню также, что тут нет никакой демократии. Тут феодализм эпохи крестовых походов. То есть власть монарха ограничена территориальными князьями и прочим баронским советом. В него входят медиевисты и реконструкторы, которые хорошо разбираются в темах. Большинство из них я знаю, хотя часто виртуально. К их мнению я, разумеется, прислушиваюсь.
Напомню также, что тут нет никакой демократии. Тут феодализм эпохи крестовых походов. То есть власть монарха ограничена территориальными князьями и прочим баронским советом. В него входят медиевисты и реконструкторы, которые хорошо разбираются в темах. Большинство из них я знаю, хотя часто виртуально. К их мнению я, разумеется, прислушиваюсь.
BY Последний Крестоносец
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels.
from de
