🇷🇺В результате работы операторов БПЛА было вскрыто замаскированное укрытие укронацистов. Точным выстрелом артиллерийским снарядом «Краснополь» оно было уничтожено💥 вместе с находящимися внутри боевиками☠️
🇷🇺В результате работы операторов БПЛА было вскрыто замаскированное укрытие укронацистов. Точным выстрелом артиллерийским снарядом «Краснополь» оно было уничтожено💥 вместе с находящимися внутри боевиками☠️
The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Now safely in France with his spouse and three of his children, Kliuchnikov scrolls through Telegram to learn about the devastation happening in his home country. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Founder Pavel Durov says tech is meant to set you free
from de
