На «РИА Новости» случайно вышла авторская статья от Петра Акопова заранее подготовленная к «концу операции» 26-го февраля. Статья очень патриотичная, рассказывает, как видит будущее российская сторона.
Статью удалили. Видимо она была поставлена автором на таймер и опубликовалась автоматически — на это намекает точное время 8:00. Но, тем не менее, возможно операция идёт не так хорошо, как планировалось.
На «РИА Новости» случайно вышла авторская статья от Петра Акопова заранее подготовленная к «концу операции» 26-го февраля. Статья очень патриотичная, рассказывает, как видит будущее российская сторона.
Статью удалили. Видимо она была поставлена автором на таймер и опубликовалась автоматически — на это намекает точное время 8:00. Но, тем не менее, возможно операция идёт не так хорошо, как планировалось.
Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. On Telegram’s website, it says that Pavel Durov “supports Telegram financially and ideologically while Nikolai (Duvov)’s input is technological.” Currently, the Telegram team is based in Dubai, having moved around from Berlin, London and Singapore after departing Russia. Meanwhile, the company which owns Telegram is registered in the British Virgin Islands. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from de
