Михаил Жариков этапирован в колонию Кировской области.
Сегодня пришло письмо от самого Михаила. Он в СИЗО-1 Кирова в транзитном статусе, а точка назначение у него - ИК-17 Омутнинска Кировской области.
Эта та колония, в которой отбывал свой первый срок Азат Мифтахов и на выходе из которой после пяти минут общения с матерью его увезли заводить новое дело за "дискредитирующие" разговоры с сокамерниками.
Михаил Жариков этапирован в колонию Кировской области.
Сегодня пришло письмо от самого Михаила. Он в СИЗО-1 Кирова в транзитном статусе, а точка назначение у него - ИК-17 Омутнинска Кировской области.
Эта та колония, в которой отбывал свой первый срок Азат Мифтахов и на выходе из которой после пяти минут общения с матерью его увезли заводить новое дело за "дискредитирующие" разговоры с сокамерниками.
#МихаилЖариков
BY НПКК_инфо
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from de
