Гурулев сегодня отдувается за притихших чиновников (даже Медведев не написал пост с угрозами «судного дня»). В ответ на разрешение от США бить дальнобойными ракетами Гурулев пригрозил уничтожить 95% США — почему не 100%?
Выглядит очень смешно, потому что таким угрозам уже два года, а красные линии давно превратились в коричневые.
Гурулев сегодня отдувается за притихших чиновников (даже Медведев не написал пост с угрозами «судного дня»). В ответ на разрешение от США бить дальнобойными ракетами Гурулев пригрозил уничтожить 95% США — почему не 100%?
Выглядит очень смешно, потому что таким угрозам уже два года, а красные линии давно превратились в коричневые.
There was another possible development: Reuters also reported that Ukraine said that Belarus could soon join the invasion of Ukraine. However, the AFP, citing a Pentagon official, said the U.S. hasn’t yet seen evidence that Belarusian troops are in Ukraine. In view of this, the regulator has cautioned investors not to rely on such investment tips / advice received through social media platforms. It has also said investors should exercise utmost caution while taking investment decisions while dealing in the securities market. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from de
