Авва, а ты анальная затычка что ли, что во все дырки лезешь с поучениями? Ты что ли со штатами воевать пойдёшь ублюдок, вместе с дезертиром Прилепиным? Привыкли твари за счёт русского Ивана выезжать, гниды.https://www.group-telegram.com/russdiary/31858
Авва, а ты анальная затычка что ли, что во все дырки лезешь с поучениями? Ты что ли со штатами воевать пойдёшь ублюдок, вместе с дезертиром Прилепиным? Привыкли твари за счёт русского Ивана выезжать, гниды.https://www.group-telegram.com/russdiary/31858
BY Торанс Vедьмак
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp.
from de
