Якщо ваша зарплата менша за 20 000грн — можете сміливо «сісти на шию» державі.
В це важко повірити, але: майже 60% українців і на половину не використовують свої права та переваги.
Повірте, використовувати пільгові програми, та говорити за свої права не соромно, соромно про них не знати. Наприклад, сьогодні кожен може:
• Отримати 2.300.000грн на купівлю житла (якщо його нема) • Повернути витрати на комуналку за останні 5 років (потрібно тільки 1 причину) • Безкоштовно відпочити в Карпатах за підтримки французького фонду (7 днів та квитки туди-назад)
І для цього не потрібно бути сином олігарха, щоб дізнаватися про такі програми одним із перших, достатньо читати MPG: Бізнес і Фінанси.
Якщо ваша зарплата менша за 20 000грн — можете сміливо «сісти на шию» державі.
В це важко повірити, але: майже 60% українців і на половину не використовують свої права та переваги.
Повірте, використовувати пільгові програми, та говорити за свої права не соромно, соромно про них не знати. Наприклад, сьогодні кожен може:
• Отримати 2.300.000грн на купівлю житла (якщо його нема) • Повернути витрати на комуналку за останні 5 років (потрібно тільки 1 причину) • Безкоштовно відпочити в Карпатах за підтримки французького фонду (7 днів та квитки туди-назад)
І для цього не потрібно бути сином олігарха, щоб дізнаватися про такі програми одним із перших, достатньо читати MPG: Бізнес і Фінанси.
"We're seeing really dramatic moves, and it's all really tied to Ukraine right now, and in a secondary way, in terms of interest rates," Octavio Marenzi, CEO of Opimas, told Yahoo Finance Live on Thursday. "This war in Ukraine is going to give the Fed the ammunition, the cover that it needs, to not raise interest rates too quickly. And I think Jay Powell is a very tepid sort of inflation fighter and he's not going to do as much as he needs to do to get that under control. And this seems like an excuse to kick the can further down the road still and not do too much too soon." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from de
