Как минимум 4 человека погибли, 30 пострадали в результате обстрела Рыльска.
Повреждены более десятка автомобилей, здания районного дома культуры, физкультурно-оздоровительного комплекса, педагогического колледжа, школы, училища, пожарной службы и пункта выдачи заказов одного из маркетплейсов
Как минимум 4 человека погибли, 30 пострадали в результате обстрела Рыльска.
Повреждены более десятка автомобилей, здания районного дома культуры, физкультурно-оздоровительного комплекса, педагогического колледжа, школы, училища, пожарной службы и пункта выдачи заказов одного из маркетплейсов
But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. He adds: "Telegram has become my primary news source." "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care.
from de
