Коррупционный строительный спрут в лице вялого члена СовФеда Владимира Киселёва и его подельника экс-депутата Законодательного Собрания Владимирской области, единоросса Олега Чижова продолжает кошмарить владимирцев и насиловать закон.
Были бы совестливыми два кислых друга х..у да уксус господа Киселев и Чижов, то давно бы застрелились или повесились. Но наглости этим двум статусным единороссам-пенсионерам не занимать. Про таких в народе говорят, что им хоть ссы в глаза - все божья роса.
Коррупционный строительный спрут в лице вялого члена СовФеда Владимира Киселёва и его подельника экс-депутата Законодательного Собрания Владимирской области, единоросса Олега Чижова продолжает кошмарить владимирцев и насиловать закон.
Были бы совестливыми два кислых друга х..у да уксус господа Киселев и Чижов, то давно бы застрелились или повесились. Но наглости этим двум статусным единороссам-пенсионерам не занимать. Про таких в народе говорят, что им хоть ссы в глаза - все божья роса.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. After fleeing Russia, the brothers founded Telegram as a way to communicate outside the Kremlin's orbit. They now run it from Dubai, and Pavel Durov says it has more than 500 million monthly active users. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised.
from de
