Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 9793 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 D.O.M. Montenegro | Telegram Webview: dommontenegro/322 -
Завтра среда, а это означает, что состоится наш очередной вечер писем политзаключённым!
Завтра мы познакомимся с проектом «Зона Солидарности». Эта инициатива освещает преследования и оказывает поддержку арестованным за антивоенные действия в РФ. Мы поговорим с представительницей «Зоны солидарности» Алёной Лакомкиной. А после разговора напишем письма узникам совести, которых поддерживает этот проект.
Встречаемся 25 сентября в 18:30 в гастробаре Тортурга на втором этаже.
Наш план максимум - написать письма каждому подопечному Зоны Солидарности. А их 20 человек!
Завтра среда, а это означает, что состоится наш очередной вечер писем политзаключённым!
Завтра мы познакомимся с проектом «Зона Солидарности». Эта инициатива освещает преследования и оказывает поддержку арестованным за антивоенные действия в РФ. Мы поговорим с представительницей «Зоны солидарности» Алёной Лакомкиной. А после разговора напишем письма узникам совести, которых поддерживает этот проект.
Встречаемся 25 сентября в 18:30 в гастробаре Тортурга на втором этаже.
Наш план максимум - написать письма каждому подопечному Зоны Солидарности. А их 20 человек!
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market. "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
