‼️Алексей Корягин, который на BMW X6 пьяным врезался в толпу пешеходов в Челябинске, ранее как минимум два раза был лишен прав за нетрезвое вождение
Об этом сообщает РИА Новости со ссылкой на источник. По информации агентства, лишения были в 2012 и 2018 годах. С 2018 года водитель минимум четыре раза становился участником ДТП.
‼️Алексей Корягин, который на BMW X6 пьяным врезался в толпу пешеходов в Челябинске, ранее как минимум два раза был лишен прав за нетрезвое вождение
Об этом сообщает РИА Новости со ссылкой на источник. По информации агентства, лишения были в 2012 и 2018 годах. С 2018 года водитель минимум четыре раза становился участником ДТП.
Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been a driving force in markets for the past few weeks. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from us
